What many of these “instructors” forget is that the armed guard is mostly not the answer and probably more of a target and a risk than anything else.
The robbers plan the execution of their operations – they don’t just by coincidence rob a garage forecourt or bomb an ATM or execute a hijacking (they collect intelligence) whilst driving past a potential target. It is an operation executed by the robbers that, without probably formal training, includes the elements of reconnaissance, planning and execution and then maybe a “dry” practice run. It might include various acts of observation of the target areas before the robbery. Eliminating that armed guard will always be in the plan of the robber – how to neutralise the armed guard and mostly take control of his weapon. Criminals plan their operations - they also determine risk and also turn targets down.
The “armed guard” is normally not in a position of power - except maybe for his firearm which he can only use in self-defence or when his life is endangered. In other words if he is by all means in a (doubtful) position of having the initiative to un foil the robbery he cannot shoot unless endangered.
Unless the defence (the users of security or the armed guard or security company) is in possession of intelligence that would point at a probable robbery risk to which additional counter measures could be introduced, the “armed guard” is more of a liability or a risk than anything else. It attracts the criminal and a special neutralisation plan from the robbers will normally include the theft of the security firearm. They will anyway always be in more numbers than the armed guard.
What is the answer – businesses with high risk activities or lucrative products or cash must conduct proper risk assessments, identify the safeguards required and to also determine the adequacy of the safeguards – that will probably negate the “armed guard” and rather focus on the hardening of the target, provision of electronic early warning and external armed response, and obviously proper insurance policies.
Let us think twice before we just say “place an armed guard” – the criminal operational plan can easily outsmart the armed guard.